Aircraft Maintenance Manuals and the Mechanic's Liability

Maintenance manuals tell the mechanic when to perform an inspection or service, and how to perform it.  Many mechanics believe that the regulations require them to follow the book exactly.Aircraft Mechanic But in an excellent column on this murky subject, mechanic and aviation author Mike Busch sums up the regulatory requirements nicely:

The manufacturer's “how-to” instructions are compulsory, but the manufacturer’s “when-to” instructions are not.

Let's say, for example, that the manual requires the aircraft’s spark plugs to be removed and regapped every 100 hours. If a mechanic decides to service the aircraft’s spark plugs, he must do it exactly as instructed in the aircraft manual. The regulations, however, do not require the mechanic to follow the manufacturer's instructions at all concerning when or how often to service the plugs, regardless of how much time the engine has accumulated. As Busch explains:

No manufacturer can mandate any maintenance requirement on a part 91 aircraft owner; only the FAA can do so.

There is another part of the story, however, that Busch's column doesn't address. The FAA regulations are bare minimum requirements only.  If an accident occurs because the mechanic failed to comply with the manufacturer’s recommendations, questions can arise as to whether the mechanic was negligent – that is, not reasonably careful -- and thus liable to those injured as a result.  A jury may conclude that, though the regulations didn't require him to, a reasonably careful mechanic would have followed the manufacturer's recommendations anyway.  After all, does a reasonably careful mechanic believe he knows better than the manufacturer? 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.aviationlawmonitor.com/admin/trackback/135474
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
David Corish, IA - October 28, 2011 6:37 PM

If your customer doesn't want you to perform a manufacturer's "mandatory" or "recommended" service bulletin, get a letter from your customer stating that the customer declines the remedial action required to address the respective service bulletin. Otherwise, it's on the A&P or IA making the signoff.

We all know service bulletins aren't "mandatory," unless something bad happens and the case ends up in court. Then the court considers the SB's "mandatory."

Mike Danko - October 28, 2011 6:46 PM

David -

Good insight. There's a another blog post that discusses what you have to say at
A Mechanic's Liability for Failure to Comply with a Manufacturer's Maintenance Instructions.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?